JÁVORT Az EU-BA!

Támogasd Te is küzdelmünket a zöld és igazságos jövőért!

EU Budget Parliament takes step in the right direction

The European Parliament today voted on the 2017 budget and the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), backing several amendments from the Greens/EFA Group.

 

Among these are the freezing of 20% of the pot in the EU Commission’s budget from which former EU commissioners are paid a transitional allowance for three years: this money will not be released until the EU Commission submits a new code of conduct.

 

Greens/EFA Group budget spokesperson Indrek Tarand said:

 

“The European Parliament has taken some steps in the right direction. The majority of MEPs have asked for more money for programmes such as LIFE, Erasmus, and the implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement. All of these are concrete projects that will benefit EU citizens.

 

“It is positive that we were able to ensure more money is made available for responding to the major political challenges we face, such as tackling the root causes that force people to flee their countries, and the integration of refugees in EU member states.  But it is clear that the new money is not sufficient. If we really want to fight the root causes of migration, we need to deliver further financial means. The governments of the EU Member States now have a duty to take up the parliament’s demands and make more money available for the EU budget.”

 

Green transparency spokesperson Benedek Jávor added:

 

“The decision to partially freeze the remuneration of former commissioners is only right and proper given the recent scandals involving ex-Commissioners Kroes and Barroso. The Commission’s ethics system is in need of urgent reform, yet they continue to insist that everything is fine. Now, the European Parliament is using its powers to effect change – if the Commission wants us to lift this budget reserve, it will have to strengthen its Code of Conduct first.”

Orbán bites the European hand that feeds his oligarchs – it’s time to bite back!

This week, the European Court of Auditors will report on how the EU spends taxpayer money. For once, the worst offending member states will be named and shamed, with Hungary set to top the list. This should just be the starting point, insist Bart Staes and Benedek Javor.

Bart Staes and Benedek Javor are both Green MEPs and members of the budgetary control committee in the European Parliament.

The ECA’s report will be presented during the plenary session of the European Parliament in Strasbourg. This year, as with the previous 21, the report states that the ECA could not declare that EU spending of almost €150 billion in 2015 was entirely free from mismanagement, negligence or fraud by member states.

What is different this year, however, is the decision by the ECA to name those countries that are the worst at ensuring EU funds are properly spent – and Hungary, under the rule of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, comes out on ‘top’.

The figures are staggering: the same Viktor Orbán who runs roughshod over basic European democratic values, the rule of law and protection of minorities, will be the proud recipient of €25 billion between 2014 and 2020 – more than any other EU country on a per capita basis apart from Lithuania – and yet a large percentage of the Hungarian projects funded by the European Union are by research of Transparency International Hungary described as ‘corrupt’.

EU funding for the regions of Europe (so-called cohesion funding) accounts for around one-third of the EU budget and is meant to help create a level social and economic playing field across the EU, reducing disparities between and within member states.

Yet despite being one of the major beneficiaries of EU funding, Hungary shows little sign of improvement – indeed regional and social inequalities in Hungary have grown significantly over the last few years. To mention just one example: Hungary’s spending on education is the lowest in the whole of the OECD, both as a percentage of total public spending and of GDP.

So where does the money go then? While some of it is undoubtedly spent on positive and useful projects for which is was intended, much of it is not. There are many cases of EU money being used to finance projects that ostensibly follow fair and transparent public procurement procedures but which in fact are often a cover for Orbán to give money to his oligarch cronies.

They include Lőrinc Mészáros, Orbán’s childhood school friends and mayor of the his home village; István Tiborcz, Orbán’s son-in-law; István Garancsi, a friend of Orbán’s and president of the football club of the town where Orbán was born; and Lajos Simicska, Orbán’s former college roommate, and former treasurer of the ruling party, who was the regime’s top oligarch until he fell out with the prime minister early last year.

In 2013 alone, the share of the combined value of tenders won by the many companies owned by these four people accounted for 11% of all public procurement contracts agreed that year. Between 2011 and 2014 the share of EU financing in the contracts won by these four men never fell below 80%; the average share of EU funds in Hungarian procurements is usually between 50 and 60%.

Simicska’s case is particularly interesting in shedding light on how this public procurement process really works. His companies won contracts worth hundreds of billions of forints before his friendship with Orbán came to a sorry end; since the rift with Orbán, his companies have won virtually nothing. In other words, if you’re close to Orbán, you have a much greater chance of winning the contract.

Ironically, it is this falling out with Orbán that means that there are still some critical voices in Hungary. Simicska rebelled against Orbán’s plans to introduce a special media tax (because it would have hurt his media interests) and now uses his once-loyal media empire to criticise the government.

Other critical voices are more easily stifled: the recent closure of leading opposition daily newspaper Népszabadság by new owners sympathetic to Orbán is just the latest example in an increasingly long list of independent voices summarily silenced.

Most Hungarians now get their news spoon-fed to them by the regime’s propaganda industry – all financed to a large extent by European taxpayers’ money meant to be used to help remove inequalities between EU member states.

Yet despite this being widely documented, the EU institutions continue to turn a blind eye. While Orbán’s crony capitalism is perhaps the most extreme example, the abuse of EU funding goes well beyond Hungary’s borders and risks irredeemably tainting the entire EU project if it is not tackled.

The naming and shaming by the ECA is just a start – real action is now needed to put an end to these abuses. Let’s hope other EU leaders and political leaders have the political courage to do just that. It’s time all relevant EU institutions start biting back at Orbán, on behalf of good governance for Hungarian citizens.

This article first appeared at the Euractiv news website: https://www.euractiv.com/section/central-europe/opinion/orban-bites-the-european-hand-that-feeds-his-oligarchs-its-time-to-bite-back/


Parliament takes step in the right direction

The European Parliament today voted on the 2017 budget and the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), backing several amendments from the Greens/EFA Group.

 

Among these are the freezing of 20% of the pot in the EU Commission’s budget from which former EU commissioners are paid a transitional allowance for three years: this money will not be released until the EU Commission submits a new code of conduct.

 

Greens/EFA Group budget spokesperson Indrek Tarand said:

 

“The European Parliament has taken some steps in the right direction. The majority of MEPs have asked for more money for programmes such as LIFE, Erasmus, and the implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement. All of these are concrete projects that will benefit EU citizens.

 

“It is positive that we were able to ensure more money is made available for responding to the major political challenges we face, such as tackling the root causes that force people to flee their countries, and the integration of refugees in EU member states.  But it is clear that the new money is not sufficient. If we really want to fight the root causes of migration, we need to deliver further financial means. The governments of the EU Member States now have a duty to take up the parliament’s demands and make more money available for the EU budget.”

 

Green transparency spokesperson Benedek Jávor added:

 

“The decision to partially freeze the remuneration of former commissioners is only right and proper given the recent scandals involving ex-Commissioners Kroes and Barroso. The Commission’s ethics system is in need of urgent reform, yet they continue to insist that everything is fine. Now, the European Parliament is using its powers to effect change – if the Commission wants us to lift this budget reserve, it will have to strengthen its Code of Conduct first.”

Press release from Benedek Jávor about the suspension of EU funds

The Hungarian government now acts as if the European Commission’s decision on the suspension of EU funds was a surprise. There is, however, no reason to be surprised: the documents foreshadowing this recent development have long been made accessible. During this time action could have easily been taken to prevent such a decision; however, the government prefers a deeply corrupt procurement system over saving EU funds. What is more is that the present decision could be followed by many more: besides the operative projects now affected by the decision there are at least half a dozen similar projects that received the same evaluation from the Commission. Without a radical alteration in the system, even planned future projects are in jeopardy. It is high time that Viktor Orbán and János Lázár decided whether it is the funding of oligarchs or the fate of the country that matters more to them.

Last December I wrote in my blog about the documents that had been sent by the respective director general of the European Commission to the European Parliament in connection with the supervision of operative programs using EU development funds. This information involved the assessment of the management of all the operative programs of all EU Member States. As I pointed out in my blog post Hungary was among the worst in all examined areas. These data also showed that the Commission not only criticized the programs, but also deemed the provision of information by the Hungarian authorities unreliable.

It was very clear from all these data that the suspension of funds was about to happen. What was predictable now turned into reality. Now at the end of the fifth year of the Orbán-regime, the government’s communication pointing the finger on former governments when talking about the inherited tender-evaluation system, is completely discredited. This is also because the Hungarian management of EU development funds was completely reorganized by the 1st of January, 2014, in that it was assimilated partly into different departments and partly into the Prime Minister’s office. What also becomes clear from the information I provided in December is that the Commission brings its decision based on data received from annual audit records and from regularly updated continuous monitoring. In the current case the decision was probably based on audit records from 2013 and 2014. There is no doubt about whose responsibility this is. What is more is that the current decision can be followed by others: besides the operative projects now affected by the decision there are at least half a dozen similar projects that received the same evaluation from the Commission – these can also be suspended increasing the amount of money lost. Without a radical alteration in the system, even planned future projects are in jeopardy.

Hungary cannot afford to lose such an amount of funds due to the irregular selection of winning tenders. The current suspension affects 700 billion Forints and, according to estimations, will only become available again after paying a sanction mounting up to about 10% of this amount. If we add the development funds lost after the suspension of the Norwegian funds as a result of the government’s attack on the civil sector, the loss goes up as high as 100 billion Forints. It is high time that Viktor Orbán and János Lázár decided whether it is the funding of oligarchs or the fate of the country that matters more to them.

Brussels-Budapest, April 16, 2015
Benedek Jávor MEP